Not super recent, but a good read.
Why I’m Not Excited About H&M’s Australian Launch
As H&M opened the doors to its first Australian store in Melbourne over the weekend, fashion media and consumers alike were chomping at the bit for the retailer’s dirt-cheap ‘fast fashion’. Labelled by some as “the best thing to happen in Australia all year”, H&M’s 5000-square metre, three-level megastore in Melbourne’s GPO building houses over one million items of fashion, accessories and homewares, and all at prices so cheap that you needn’t think twice before buying.
And therein lies the problem. Well, one of the problems. H&M, with their $6.95 tanks and $12.95 jeans, encourage the kind of mindless consumerism that fast fashion thrives off — buy cheap and buy lots. The proliferation of wallet-friendly clothes and accessories that are ‘designer-inspired’ (a lovely little euphemism for ‘shameless rip-off’) has led many to confuse this increasing disposability of fashion with ‘democratisation’.
But with cheap prices, the victor isn’t really the consumer — it’s the fast fashion empires. Quantity over quality is a horribly unsustainable approach, but it’s the reason why H&M Chairman Stefan Persson is making mad bank (est. $32.8 billion), and also why most of our fast fashion purchases literally fall apart at the seams before even coming close to the 30th wear (the number recommended by sustainability journalist, Lucy Siegle).
Fast fashion’s seductively low prices encourage us to buy things we don’t need (and sometimes don’t really want) with little regard for the enormous environmental and human costs of this rapid-fire supply chain that squeezes margin from those who are most vulnerable — garment workers in developing nations halfway across the world. H&M are estimated to produce 20-25% of their products in Bangladesh, making them the largest player in the country, and while they have gone some way to working towards a living wage (they aim to pay their workers a living wage by 2018), Labour Behind The Label — a UK-based collective of trade unions, charities and consumer organisations who work to support workers’ rights – argues that H&M’s projects “do not show evidence of delivering a living wage for workers any time soon” and that they have yet to put a figure on what the living wage actually is. H&M don’t own any of their own factories, and while they require their direct suppliers to sign a Code of Conduct and are subject to their Full Audit Program, they acknowledge that they don’t have direct contact with or influence over “second-tier” suppliers. It’s this lack of transparency in supply chains that leads to exploitation of workers, and in extreme cases, tragedies like Rana Plaza last April.
To be fair, though, as far as fast fashion empires go, H&M is not all evil. In fact, it was recently named as one of the ‘World’s Most Ethical Companies’ according to Ethisphere for its leadership in signing the Bangladeshi Accord on Fire and Building Safety, as well as its ‘Conscious Exclusive’ collection made from sustainable materials. It is also one of the world’s largest buyers of organic cotton. But these achievements are dwarfed by the sheer amount of resources used to make the estimated 550 million garments it sells each year.
Fast fashion is a huge drain on the environment — the textile industry is one of world’s largest users and polluters of water, thanks to the prevalence of cotton (a very thirsty plant grown in mostly dry regions like India, Mali and southern USA), as well as the many chemicals and dyes used in treating fabric. A single pair of jeans uses up to 5678 litres of water, and emits the same amount of carbon dioxide as driving 125km. No matter how many ‘conscious collections’ H&M produce, as long as they make more and more clothes, their impact on the environment is significant. As Siegle wrote in her analysis of H&M’s 2012 sustainability report, “Despite an understanding of all the pressures on Planet Earth sketched out in the report, there are no plans to scale back on ambition or indeed inventory.”
Besides the manufacturing costs of fast fashion, there is also the economic impact to local retailers and designers that will be felt as international fashion empires move in. Of course, healthy competition and a range of options is a great thing for the fashion customer, but Australian boutiques run the risk of being priced out of the market by H&M’s global buying power. Plus, the speed in which H&M can copy catwalk trends will drive sales away from Australian designers, many of whom are already flailing (think Ksubi, Lisa Ho, Kirrily Johnston and Alannah Hill to name a few).
While you may argue that there is no crossover between the H&M and high-end designer customer, the response to last week’s launch by the fashion media suggests otherwise. As I watched my Instagram feed swell with giddy images of the thousand-odd media, bloggers and celebrities that flocked to the Melbourne store for the big event, it was clear that the industry was drinking the H&M Kool Aid.
H&M are a well-oiled marketing machine, and the launch was major: 300 Sydney VIPs were flown down to Melbourne on a special flight, and indie-pop darlings Haim were brought in from Los Angeles to DJ the event. Luxury fashion titles like Vogue Australia, Elle and Harper’s Bazaar covered the event, despite H&M being far from the designer labels they usually endorse. On the eve of Australian Fashion Week, it was H&M — a Swedish fast fashion, mass-market retailer — that dominated the fashion pages, leaving local designers in the dark. Through a spectacular event and a generous media buy (just have a look at the banner ads bordering this Vogue gallery), H&M has managed to spin fashion credibility out of thin air.
As H&M continues to feed our clothing addiction with some of the lowest prices this country has ever seen, the fast fashion machine grows ever more powerful. The race to the bottom speeds up, and all the while the fashion media sips on champers and toasts the arrival of another mass-market giant. Instead of critically examining the company’s effect on the retail and fashion industry, we are left with images of ‘media personalities’ getting drunk on H&M’s bar tab. The publicists won this round — the complete narrative of H&M has been obscured by beautiful people in shiny clothes.
There’s no doubt the retailer, like Topshop and Zara before it, will find massive success in the Australian market — we do love a bargain. But if you find yourself in line this week at the Melbourne store, among the thousands of other shoppers, please take a moment to think about the true cost of your $12.95 skinny jeans.
Maddy Newman runs a fashion magazine for a major e-commerce company. Before that she produced a talk-back radio program for the over 65s. Consequently, she knows a lot about the Internet, shoes and Andre Rieu.
I was lucky enough to work at both days of the Myer spring summer 2015 fashion launch. There are so many beautiful designs coming into stores, lovely pastels and florals. My favourites were definitely Alex Perry (does he ever put a for wrong?!) and By Johnny. Both were beautiful!!
Ethical Clothing Australia he lost its funding from the Australian Government. This organisation does great work to promote ethical fashion so please click on the link below and sign the letter to the government to bring back funding to ECA!
Meet: Aber Proscovia
What she likes about crocheting: “I enjoy crocheting because it keeps me busy and helps me to no longer worry about my future.”
See the ladies who make the wonderful products from Krochet Kids. This is one of my favourite labels. They provide work, a liveable income and skills for women in Peru and Uganda.
millymonster16 said: i want to study fashion and marketing but i also get worried. is it possible to get a career? its the only thing that doesn't sound terrible and i feel somewhat passionate about. im just worried its not a practical choice
Yes! Many people think that there is little career opportunity in fashion, but it is a multi billion dollar industry with so many different areas to go into from design to PR to marketing.
I think it is a good idea to study both fashion and marketing as this will give you a great set of skills to go into different areas (depending on what you’re interested in).
But the biggest thing to remember is that you must be passionate to succeed, work hard, take any internship opportunities that come your way and always network! As well as what you know, the fashion industry is very much about who you know.
I hope this helped. Good luck with your decision :)
This is an article I recently read about a customer of Primark who found a note left in the garment from a factory worker. Since then, another customer has found a similar hand embroidered note. These workers are crying for help. Make a stand and write to Primark to tell them that sweatshop production is not acceptable.
Article source: http://ht.ly/yz75M (ecouterre)
"A Primark shopper got more than she bargained after discovering a “cry for help” sewn into the lining of her cut-price dress. Rebecca Gallagher from Swansea, Wales, was searching her £10 buy for washing instructions when she found a label bearing the hand-embroidered words, “Forced to work exhausting hours.” Gallagher believes that a garment worker stitched the message in a fit of desperation. “I’ve got no idea who put it there but it really took the wind out of my sails,” she told the South Wales Evening Post. “It makes me think that it was a cry for help—to let us people in Britain know what is going on.”
The 25-year-old mother of one, who claims the discount retailer hung up when she called about the label, says the incident has forced her to rethink the way she consumes. “To be honest I’ve never really thought much about how the clothes are made,” Gallagher said. “But this really made me think about how we get our cheap fashion. I dread to think that my summer top may be made by some exhausted person toiling away for hours in some sweatshop abroad.”
Primark, one of the brands that sourced clothing from the infamous Rana Plaza factory in Bangladesh, as well as the first U.K. retailer to sign the legally binding Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh, says there have been “no other incidents of this kind” relating to the garment in question. “We find it very strange that this has come to light so recently, given that the dress was on sale more than a year ago,” a spokesman said in a statement on Monday. “We would be grateful if the customer would give us the dress, so we can investigate how the additional label became attached and whether there are issues which need to be looked into.”
This isn’t the first time alleged sweatshop workers have used merchandise to communicate their distress. In 2012, a woman found in her Saks Fifth Avenue shopping carrier a note from a man who said he was forced to work 13-hour days at a Chinese prison factory to make the bags.”
The photos below are of the customer who has since found a similar tag in her Primark garment.
Today, April 24, is Fashion Revolution Day. It has been one year since the tragedy in Rana Plaza and to bring attention to ethical fashion, Fashion Revolution Day was started. So have a look at the label on your clothes and see who made them.
Be curious, find out, and do something.